| Rummer rooflines are distinctive—certainly
they are among the signature design elements of these
dynamic mid-century homes. The flat and gently pitched
roofs found on Rummers were common features in the modern
design vernacular as developed by the architects from
whom Rummer took his inspiration. In addition to the flat
and low pitched roof, some of these houses feature a steeply
gabled roof over the central portion of the house combined
with a flat roof over the adjoining wings. This combination
of flat and gabled roofs provides a dramatic roofline
and exciting interior spaces and it would seem to owe
much to the work of architect A Quincy Jones.
But as Rummer owners will testify, these distinctive
rooflines come with their own set of maintenance issues.
Flat roofs invite standing water which can, when the
roof surface becomes degraded, eventually penetrate
into the house and damage structural elements. Roofs
pitched less than 3 in 12 that don’t utilize proper
materials will also be challenged by water intrusion,
especially in the Willamette Valley with it’s
heavy rainfall and often driving winds.
Roofs, and it doesn’t matter if you’re
talking Rummers or cape cods, don’t always receive
the maintenance attention they require. Maybe it’s
that out of sight out of mind thing. We just won’t
think about that system over our heads until forced
to do so by the drip (or worse) produced by a leaking
roof. That being said, roofs always need attention and
scrutiny by homeowners. The shape and style of Rummer
rooflines require a heightened awareness (and commitment
to the correct system) on the part of the owners. Perhaps
it can be considered as the price of admission to the
enjoyment these houses can give.
A Case Study in Roof Problems
The
Oak Hills double gable Rummer featured here provides
a good illustration of roof issues that might be encountered.
The owner actually had a new roof installed a few years
earlier both on the gabled portion of the house and
on the flat roof areas. The new roof seemed to solve
the leak problems that had been occurring prior to its
installation. However, it is suspected that a new leak
resulted from improper chimney flashing when the gable
portion of the roof was installed. Water entered high
up on the gable where the chimney and roof meet and
flowed down the gable under the roof shingles and collected
where the gable and the flat roofs join. Eventually
this resulted in dry rot in the 2X6 tongue and groove
roof decking along the juncture of the gable and flat
roof areas.
Because
of the post and beam construction and the exposed roof
decking, the rot damage to the decking became visible
from the underside. It was especially noticeable on
the exterior of the house under the broad eaves, but
it was also developing in the interior. What made matters
more interesting, rot was also developing in the cantilevered
exterior portion of the 4”X12” structural
beam that runs along and supports the roof system at
the juncture of the gabled and flat roofs. The damage
to the exposed exterior portion of the beam was severe,
requiring replacement. Because the portion of the beam
was cantilevered, the beam would need to be replaced
back to at least twice the length of the cantilevered
portion. As noted, damage in the roof
decking was visible on the interior of the house in
the living room. But the beam at this point was concealed
behind the paneling of the wall separating the living
room and the master bedroom. This wall needed to be
opened up, removing the paneling, to determine how far
into the interior portion of the house the decking and
beam damage extended.
A couple of other considerations added a bit more spice
to the mix. A very large plate glass window fitted right
up against the 4x beam that needed to be replaced. And
because the work was being done in early spring in the
Willamette Valley, the amount of time that the roof
could be open to the weather needed to be as short as
possible.
When the living room/ bedroom wall
was opened up it seemed that about 15 of the 2x6 decking
boards would need to be replaced on the gable portion
of the roof over the living room and about the same
number on the flat roof over the master bedroom. Damage
to the beam
extended about the same distance as the damage to the
decking. This portion of the beam required replacement
anyway to maintain the integrity of the cantilever.
The Plan
Now that the extent of the problem
was determined the contractor could propose a game plan.
The idea was to remove and replace the structural beam
while the roof was still in place. This would reduce
the time the roof would be open to the weather. A portion
of the exterior wall where the beam passed through needed
to opened so that the damaged portion of the beam could
be removed and so that the new beam could be positioned
in place. Luckily an in wall air conditioning unit was
located perfectly and no further opening of the exterior
walls was necessary after the removal of the air conditioning
unit. The contractor decided to leave the large plate
glass window that fit against the beam in place and
keep fingers crossed. The living room/ bedroom wall
was already opened, so the beam was now accessible.
Removing the Damaged
Beam Portion
First
step was to build temporary shoring to support the roof
structure while the beam was removed. This was done
for the gable portion in the living room and the flat
roof over the master bedroom. With the roof temporarily
supported, the portion of the beam to be replaced was
cut into sections using a reciprocating saw.
These sections were removed using pry bars, sledges
and elbow grease. Once the old beam sections were cleared
the damage to the roof decking wasclearly visible
as can be seen in the photos below.

Beam Replacement
The
new beam was cut to length. In the original construction
the top of the beam had been notched to accept the decking
coming down from the gable and the decking over the
flat portion of the roof. The contractor reproduced
this joint on the new beam using a circular saw. Getting
the new beam into place was a bit of a challenge, but
after a couple of attempts it slid into position. The
new portion of the beam was tied into the portion still
in place and secured to existing posts/supports.
Replacing Roof Decking
Phase
two or the operations was to peel back the roof so that
the damaged decking could be replaced. The roofing contractor
first removed the composition shingles from the gable
portion of the roof along with the original and extra
insulation which had been added over the years.
Then the membrane material over the flat deck was cut
away, insulation removed and the decking exposed
Once the roof materials were removed the damage to the
decking is clearly visible

The
flat decking boards were removed and replaced first,
and the gable portion followed. The contractor made
sure that Hemlock was used in replacing the roof decking.
"Most people look at the decking on these Rummer
houses and think that it is Douglas Fir. That
is not the case. If you want to match the original
materials you'll almost always find that it was Hemlock."
The structural repairs were completed
in about a day and a half of work time. Preparation
for the beam removal required another half day.
The roofing contractor had the roof buttoned back up
the next day.
Best of all--the weather remained clear
and dry for the days that the house was open to the
elements.
s
|